Landlord has not rescinded his current contract, the seller provided no contact

The landlord has his contract not rescinded in its electricity provider for the rented apartment after the entry of tenants and left no contact except the rented apartment.

Tenants have not immediately selected a new provider, because there were some problems and had expected a letter from the local power in the worst case,

The current provider of the landlord sends meantime vain payment reminders to the landlord on the tenant address and tries remedy current. Tenants learn through the secondment test who is the electricity supplier and that the landlord has not rescinded his contract. Tenants provide contact details of the owner according to lease further and sign up just half meter reading at the same time from the beginning of the lease at.

Owner sends payment order for the bill for electricity supplies under his name, accounting for unsuccessful blocking of the terminal and reminders for unpaid invoices, as well as legal costs and interest.

The tenants, according to lease obligation electricity for its own account to relate directly, but without a deadline for registration. There was no intention of the tenant does not pay the electricity. They assumed that they would get a letter from the local power.

If the landlord a right to demand the costs incurred by its Versaumnis by the tenant? If the landlord a right to demand the costs for power consumption without production of bill? As die the tenants best against such claims do?

The best answer

If the landlord a right to demand the costs incurred by its Versaumnis by the tenant?

First of all, the tenant has absolutely nothing to do with a possible contractual relationship between landlord and electricity suppliers.

Then the landlord has not met a secondary obligation in his contract with the electricity supplier and that is the announcement of the new address, and the transmission of the final count.

The real question now is whether the landlord can ensure that these costs are accrued really make liable the tenant. Again, there are arguments, because the tenant would have to strive for their own electricity contract in time, would be much of happening. You have acted with negligence. I dare not here oracles how that would see a judge, because both meet here part of the blame.

If the landlord a right to demand the costs for power consumption without production of bill

Definitely not. The electricity provider has initially no right at all to demand these things from the owner after it is clear what proportion of current owner has to pay. The count was so informed by the tenants. The power company has to correct the invoice for the proprietor and then normally issue its own accounts to tenants.

The landlord can not simply pay an excessive electricity bill and then claim damages from the tenants also. Why should they? Afterwards get the owner from the power supplier credit and the money has suddenly doubled.

As die the tenants best against such claims do?

If I understand you correctly, is here already a court order in the room. I would here personally seek legal confrontation, so actually completely disagree and then wait. In court, the owner looks ever stupid from its demand for reimbursement of the cost of electricity. The falls so away quite safe. Then we will see if the court follows the landlord that the tenant etc. the damage over any barrier costs has done. As said both carry guilt. Perhaps not running it it beyond that costs are shared, perhaps. Who knows.

The tenants, according to lease obligation electricity for its own account to relate directly, but without a deadline for registration.

Legally defined, that the very first use of energy in a new apartment, a so-called energy supply comes. This happens, for example, if one turns the light for the first time. In the jargon, this is called also implied behavior. In addition, the apartment owner or tenant must notify the primary care in writing to refer henceforth energy (eg electricity, gas, district heating).

In fact, here exerts the tenant and not the landlord of the genuine power over the power supply. This looks, moreover, the BGH that.

http: //news.toptarif.de/wo-sie-recht-haben-auch-ohne-stromvertrag-muss-genutzter ...

Owner sends payment order for the bill for electricity supplies under his name, accounting for unsuccessful blocking of the terminal and reminders for unpaid invoices, as well as legal costs and interest

If the tenant against the payment order shall oppose the landlord must justify the court on his claim or demand. Then the judge decides this question.

Possibly it also comes in the decision on whether the landlord used to live even in the apartment and therefore current contract has not yet passed, or whether he was practically "forced" by the universal service provider, for example, due to vacancy or not be running tenant changes, the current contract maintain. Upon termination and shutdown would namely again high connection charges that carry the owner would have incurred.

Did you just a sub-counter? Or its own electricity supply?

This is too confused and will end badly. use electricity without registration, is simply theft. Correctly, not barred this matter and the universal service provider will certainly zulangen even violently. Good luck and mt the landlord you have nothing to do. The may be me confront its counterparty. Also easily.

Hi, all kinky very!

The tenants, according to lease obligation electricity for its own account to relate directly, but without a deadline for registration.

And when should this happen? Until the blocking threat in any case no current reference was notified to Someone - but consumes power. And such an operation is made only after a long time (!) And a few reminders of the outstanding amounts.

There was no intention of the tenant does not pay the electricity.

Aha. And when should the counter are then in which providers account? The tenant is obliged to take care of as quickly after collection and first use, otherwise intent (electricity theft) could be adopted.

Why should write Stadtwerke if where a provider change is not disclosed? But why everything is about the owner and these receivables, remains unclear.

greetings

Date: 2018-07-25 Views: 0

Related articles

Links

Domicile|Sante|

Copyright (C) 2019 m3tch.com, All Rights Reserved.

M3tch all rights reserved.

processed in 2.131 (s). 10 q(s)