I am always overwhelmed by acquaintances with Infomails about the dangers and futility of vaccinations.
I think you should vaccinate. A close relative is the rubella mother during pregnancy a disabled woman.
But the opponents of vaccination are not times to impress in the one in the next relationship is someone who has suffered from a childhood disease. I vaccinate our children, because I saw the vaccinations to prevent the chance of dangerous diseases such as mumps, polio and measles.
An anti-immunization has me once said that there are all these diseases no longer at, but I thought this will be child protected by all the other children vaccinated. But the man told me, he can treat his child with globules, the cancer cells with (???) to be obtained, would be better protected his child. Can that be right? Is that possible?
I'm at a loss, I have done wrong with seeding? Would it have been better not to vaccinate?
The best answer
I also so someone then read in the circle, I have a book of her than I was then reading a AIDS vaccine damage, I have put it away immediately. I was then also not go wrong and have decided on a conscious seeding. I am a proponent of ALSO Globulis however support. So I'm looking for the advice of Dr. Andrea Schmelz (there are websites) held after I read tens material of opponents and proponents. At the time I took the 5 fold vaccination of Pentavac since at least was mercury in this. And have hepatitis A and B from a manufacturer whose name I have forgotten. These have had the least side effects, In addition, I have with Thuja - Globulis tries mitigate the Nacherscheinungen occurring. I can say for myself that I have tried to find a middle ground. For me personally, the truth lies in between. I can understand both sides, but everyone has to find that out for himself and his child. I know people who vaccinate without thinking, because it will make all and also know many who reject all (which, however, can result in school enrollment problems). What your feelings tell a mother that's right. Ultimately I did not know what is right. I thought then: If I do it, and it happens that I can not live with it and if I do, then I can not deal with it and my compromise has felt good for me also. This said doctor does that make sense explains for me personally and acuh other useful tips in stock. So do you no head, only you have to stand you about your choices and answer questions.
Vaccinations are sinnvoll.Homöopathie, this includes those sugar pills, globules is called nonsense. Do not let nnoch kirre make of the conspiracy theorists the idea of medicine has not. Look around at times gwup.de.
In my opinion you have done everything right.
Read times this product from 10/10/2014
http: //www.derwesten.de/staedte/iserlohn/als-die-pocken-das-sauerland-in-furcht -...
I can still remember the smallpox in 1970 in Meschede. My partner was there to study.
The anti-vaccinators movement is getting stronger, recommend can this opinion but not. The primary vaccination schedule is and remains useful, this 'extinct' disease are not going away, just suppressed. Should now make all their children vaccinated, we have the problems soon.
You have done nothing wrong. I see it as you. Vaccinations are one way to protect yourself and others can also (still) not be vaccinated against diseases. From globules of cancer cells I've never heard and in a hurry now also found nothing about it. How are sugar pills help against diseases?
An anti-immunization has me once said that there are all these diseases garnichtmehr,
Measles, there may well still. Strikingly often where vaccination rates are low. eg in Waldorf schools because there many anthroposophists cavort my measles would be important for the "karmic" development of children. According alia Guru Rudolf Steiner a child gets measles namely when it has "pondered" in a "previous life" too much. And because the guru has decided so that measles can be prevented by simply not measles vaccine. The result can be read here:
Even polio still exist in a few regions - where religious fanatics boycott the appropriate vaccination.
But the man told me, he can treat his child with globules, the cancer cells with (???) to be obtained, would be better protected his child. Can that be right? Is that possible?
Globules made from cancer cells (although afterwards no longer there are), there is actually. can treat it so that children of course - only one action that would exceed those of a sugar pill is just not used - which incidentally applies to all globules.